Scala is great and all though I’m not familiar with it and the maintainer of the deployment tool I’ve been using since 2016 ended active support for s3_website earlier this year. That’s too bad because s3_website was a huge breath of fresh air for me given its support for deploying both Jekyll and Hugo, among others.
In addition to its support for various generators s3_website also has some novel features for deployments to AWS not trivial otherwise including:
Shortly after
the buzz of MS purchasing GitHub I started self-hosting a Gitea stack using a Docker Compose file I threw together just for the occasion. The hosting I chose at the time was a
$5 Vultr VPS with the following specs:
- CPU: 1 vCore
- RAM: 1024 MB
- Storage: 25 GB SSD
- Bandwidth: 1000 GB
I chose Vultr partly because they’ve been
shown to be faster than
DO and Lightsail. But really I just needed a testbed to prove things out. Something I
did
through
sharing
knowledge on the Gitea Support forums before, months later, finally feeling confident enough to abandon GitHub.
But Vultr isn’t cutting it anymore. Their $5/month VPS option, while arguably a great deal, isn’t delivering enough storage. Sure I could add block storage at $0.50 per GB or even consider switching to Linode. But I don’t see the point of either when Amazon offers a 40 GB SSD option at $5 an instance with double the bandwidth offered by Vultr and half the cost of the Linode equivalent plan.
As luck would have it, last night I ran out of disk space on Vultr. What better a time to make the switch over to
Amazon Lightsail? And if you’re looking to self-host Gitea on Lightsail, here’s how you can too.
The need for speed is upon us. Out of the box the speed of an Octopress site kinda drags. However, there are a number of things you can do to to speed it up without a complete overhaul. Learn how to turbocharge your Octopress blog.
In 2016 this website underwent a major overhaul. I took it off my simple Docker set-up and moved it to S3 with CloudFront. The process of which enabled me to reduce hosting costs by 80% all while increasing reach and decreasing page load times globally.
But static websites have a perceived disadvantage: they’re static. They have no inherent dynamic functionality. What will you do when you want to add some piece of interactivity—a contact form, or an email distribution list? Sure you could go with TypeForm or TinyLetter. But you could also create your own service using FaaS (a.k.a. Serverless). Afterall, Serverless isn’t just a fad, and it’s
not going away anytime soon.
